The Court of Appeal has very recently handed down judgment in Lord Bishop of Leeds & Others v Dixon Coles & Gill. The case concerns the ability of an insurer to aggregate claims of different clients who have had monies misappropriated by a dishonest solicitor pursuant to clause 2.5(a)(ii) of the Minimum Terms & Conditions, which allows for claims to be aggregated if they arise from a “series of related acts or omissions”. Sam Moore has prepared a note on the case which is available here.
